In this article, we’ll be discussing the 2 titans in-game streaming: Twitch and YouTube Gaming. during this showdown between Twitch vs YouTube Gaming, we’ll be doing our greatest to spotlight the pros and cons of both platforms for streamers worldwide.
1). Twitch vs YouTube Gaming: Introducing The Competitors
Twitch, or Twitch.tv, started as an offshoot of the lesser-known Justin.tv, a general streaming service. Twitch was focused on game-streaming and quickly took off, leading to the eventual closing of Justin.tv in favor of full specialize in Twitch, is now starting to expand to hide live non-gaming events, art and more.
Twitch’s massive popularity soon meant that two titans sought to get it Google and Amazon. While Google was long rumored to be the one to try to do the work , Amazon is ultimately the one who won out. Twitch enjoys a monthly audience of over 100 million unique users and over 2.1 million broadcasters, despite being founded only five years ago. In short, it latched onto a craze nobody knew existed: the will to observe people play video games in real-time.
- Read: All Streamer News
Gaming has always been big on YouTube, and because the children who were raised on gaming and technology began to enter the video-watching market, YouTube became the most important place in online video. Unfortunately, despite their launch of a streaming platform, they weren’t ready to continue with the expansion of Twitch, and by the time YouTube Gaming launched Twitch has already become the good incumbent within the field. (That had to be a bitter irony to swallow.)
Despite this, YouTube Gaming has enjoyed moderate success. In fact, there are some ways it’s better than Twitch…and some ways it’s worse. the 2 are true competitors on all terms- and albeit Twitch is winning the fight in terms of sheer audience numbers, YouTube Gaming is nothing to sneeze at, either.
2). Twitch vs YouTube Gaming: UI and usefulness
- Twitch’s UI is straightforward and works well. all of your options and site-browsing features are on the left side of the screen, allowing the stream itself to require front-and-center, functions associated with that stream (Following and Subscribing) beneath it, and chat in its own dedicated side of the screen to the proper.
- However, it’s a couple of downsides: namely, choosing video quality uses infuriatingly vague terms like “Medium”, “Mobile” and “Source”- all of which may vary in actual quality counting on the streamer’s specific settings and setup.
- Additionally, DVR features- pausing and rewinding- are absent. If you missed something within the stream, you’ll need to await the stream recording to upload an hour approximately later.
- YTG also enjoys an easy UI, but YTG’s interface takes up slightly more room and usually features a lot more clutter on display, thanks to the very fact it also features a goal of advertising the streamer’s main YouTube channel. the 2 are about even in terms of design and pure usability, though.
- That being said, YTG handles video quality far more intuitively. It handles it an equivalent way YouTube does- offering real-world resolutions (480p, 1080p, etc) for a user to settle on from that don’t vary in quality counting on the streamer. this enables users to urge a uniform viewing experience supported by what their connections can handle.
- Thanks to the YouTube backend, YTG also enjoys DVR features. One can pause a stream and begin right back where they left off and may rewind to a point during a stream at any time. YTG gets major points over Twitch during this regard.
3). Twitch vs YouTube Gaming: Revenue
- Like YouTube, Twitch supports an advertising partner system. The barrier of entry, however, is usually higher. Ad revenue varies greatly, too, but is somewhat on-par with YouTube’s in most cases.
- Twitch users enjoy regular donations and subscriptions from their followers. A Subscription pays $2.50 to Twitch and to the individual streamer per month, with many sponsorship deals doubling on each subscription to assist the streamer make extra money. the typical Twitch user donates a minimum of $5 per month. thanks to how averages work, this suggests while many users don’t donate in the least, there are many that donate hundreds, or maybe thousands of dollars to streamers on a daily basis.
- The overall revenue of streamers on Twitch is above that of YTG.
- YTG may be a part of YouTube, and thus uses its partner program and advertising model. This program features a low barrier of entry for people to participate in, however- useful for people with small channels or small followings.
- YTG also offers donations, but generally, Twitch users get more regular donations at higher amounts.
- The overall revenue of streamers on YTG is less than that of Twitch, though this might change because the platform grows.
- witch vs YouTube Gaming: Chat and Moderation
4). Streaming Audiences
- Twitch chat is an iconic centerfold of the platform. Subscribing to a channel grants you access to their emotes, which may then be utilized in other channels as a badge of pride.
- Additionally, Twitch chat offers much better moderation tools, and even bots like NightBot. this suggests that chat is more easily controlled on Twitch, and also significantly more interactive.
- Higher audience interaction = better audience retention.
- YouTube Gaming offers little within the way of moderation features or special incentives.
- This is an excellent limiting factor, and means Twitch chat easily wins this fight.
If you’re trying to grow your following across Twitch and YouTube alike, Twitch is far and away the higher choice, because it offers you access to a way larger general audience. While you won’t be ready to enjoy ad revenue within the earliest state of your Twitch channel, you’ll grow much better through Twitch than you’d through YouTube Gaming. YouTube Gaming, meanwhile, is way better for engaging with the audience you have already got through your YouTube subscribers. While its chat is nowhere near as versatile, it’s much easier to urge a YouTube subscriber than a Twitch follower onto a stream, because of YouTube’s ubiquity.